Guide for Authors¶
Before submitting your project for review with pyOpenSci, make sure that it adheres to the standards and guidelines put forward in the authoring guide.
Submission for Peer Review¶
To request peer review, start a new issue in the pyOpenSci/software-review repository and fill out the “Submit Software for Review” issue template. For more information on the process and timeline for review, see our section on the review process.
If you would like, your package can be submitted to the Journal of Open-Source Software (JOSS) after passing pyOpenSci review. In this case, the package will evaluated by JOSS based on the pyOpenSci review and the paper accompanying your package (see below).
If you choose to have your package submitted to JOSS after review, it should include a paper.md file describing the package. More detail on JOSS’s requirements can be found at their website.
Important note: Acceptance to pyOpenSci does not guarantee acceptance to JOSS. In particular, JOSS doesn’t accept all the types of packages that pyOpenSci does. For example, thin API wrappers fall within pyOpenSci’s scope but are usually not accepted by JOSS. Be sure to review JOSS’s submission requirements before writing up a paper about your package.
If you choose this option you should not submit your package to JOSS separately.
If your package does not clearly fit within one of the categories outlined in our scope, create a Presubmission Inquiry issue in our software-review repo. You can use the same issue template if you have other questions. An editor will get back to you in a few days to answer your questions.
Package Prep Help¶
If you would like help preparing your package for review, create a Help Request issue in the software-review repo. We can assign someone to help you prep your code and add things like testing, documentation, and/or continuous integration. We’re happy to help. Also check out the rest of our Packaging Guide, which may help answer some of your questions about packaging your code.